iSAYSO
Contribute

What is driving the intensification of flooding in New Zealand?

Share on FacebookShare on XInteractive reader

The Great MCERT Rabbit Farm

The New “Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport”

A Ministry With Hundreds of Holes, Thousands of Rabbits, and No Carrots to Show for It

Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

BY NIGEL GRAY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATOR 28 AUGUST 2026

 
 

Preface — How a Flood Investigation Turned Into a Rabbit Hunt

I began this investigation with a simple question:
What is driving the intensification of flooding in New Zealand?

I wasn’t looking for politics.
I wasn’t looking for bureaucracy.
I wasn’t looking for anything except the physical cause.

So I did what any investigator does — I followed the evidence.

I isolated variables.
I eliminated red herrings.
I traced aerosol pathways.
I mapped cloud‑condensation nuclei formation.
I compared satellite imagery.
I tracked shipping routes.
I analysed plume behaviour.
I checked the literature.

And the conclusion was unavoidable:

Shipping emissions are a primary driver of flood‑intensifying cloud formation in New Zealand.

That was the science.

Then came the shock.

Because when I turned to government agencies to see whether they held information relevant to this — they did.
They held documents, diagrams, internal notes, and staff‑authored material that aligned with exactly what I had found.

But what I did not expect to discover was something else entirely.

Not a missing dataset.
Not a scientific gap.
Not a technical limitation.

I discovered a rabbit infestation.

A sprawling, multi‑layered, multi‑managerial warren of roles, titles, chiefs, leaders, deputy leaders, general managers, programme managers, team leaders, heads, directors, and transformation officers — all burrowing in different directions, all very busy, all very important, and none of them producing the one thing New Zealand actually needs:

measurement.

What began as an environmental investigation ended as a structural one.

Because behind every unanswered question, every contradictory OIA response, every missing dataset, every “we do not monitor this,” every “we hold no information,” every “no evidence exists,” was not a scientific problem.

It was a bureaucratic ecosystem.

A Ministry of Rabbits.

And once you see it, you cannot unsee it.

There’s a moment in every investigation where the metaphor becomes clearer than the facts themselves.
For MCERT, that moment arrived the second their organisational chart landed in my inbox.

Because what they sent wasn’t a chart.
It was a rabbit farm.

A sprawling, multi‑layered, multi‑tunneled, multi‑managerial warren of roles, titles, chiefs, leaders, deputy leaders, general managers, programme managers, team leaders, heads, directors, and transformation officers — all burrowing in different directions, all very busy, all very important, and none of them producing anything measurable.

So let’s call it what it is.

A Ministry of Rabbits.

🐇 How Many Rabbits?

The organisational chart shows 520–600 management‑grade roles.

Not analysts.
Not scientists.
Not environmental monitors.
Not emissions measurers.
Not field staff.

Just rabbits with titles.

And that’s only the visible ones.
The real population — once you include advisors, coordinators, assistants, contractors, digital teams, legal teams, comms teams, regional staff, and the SME lists they keep referring to — is likely 1,200–1,800 rabbits.

🕳️ How Many Holes?

Each rabbit has a hole.

Some have several.

The chart shows:

6 Executive Leaders

20+ Deputy Executive Leaders

40+ General Managers

100+ Directors

200+ Managers

100+ Team Leaders

50+ Chiefs, Heads, Leads, Programme Managers

Every one of these is a hole.
Every hole has a rabbit.
Every rabbit has a title.

And every title has a salary.

 

 
Premium Photo | An empty rabbit burrow in a field
 

💰 How Much Are We Feeding Them?

Even at the lowest public‑sector salary bands:

Team Leaders: $95k–$130k

Managers: $120k–$160k

General Managers: $200k–$280k

Executive Leaders: $300k–$380k

Chief Executive: $540k–$620k

The visible rabbit‑population alone costs:

≈ 68M–72M per year

Once you include the full warren:

≈ 180M–260M per year

That’s a quarter of a billion dollars.

A quarter of a billion dollars…
to run a Ministry that cannot measure shipping emissions.

🥕 How Many Carrots Do They Produce?

This is the part that matters.

Because a rabbit farm is fine — if it produces carrots.

But MCERT does not produce carrots.

It does not produce:

shipping emissions data

atmospheric hazard monitoring

aerosol surveillance

CCN measurement

environmental risk detection

scientific outputs

operational outputs

measurable public value

It produces:

templates

inboxes

workflows

intranet pages

SME lists

coordination meetings

“holding the pen”

“logging into workflow tools”

“updating templates”

“discussing inbox access”

This is administrative metabolism, not environmental protection.

It is a Ministry designed to move paper, not measure reality.

🔥 The OIA That Cuts Straight to the Heart of the Rabbit Farm

This is the OIA that exposes the warren:

Total staff count

Total salary cost

Total measurable output

If they answer honestly, the public will see the truth.
If they refuse, the public will see the truth even more clearly.

Either way, the rabbit farm is exposed.

🎯 Why This Matters

Because New Zealanders believe they have a Ministry that protects the environment.

What they actually have is:

a Ministry that protects its inboxes

a Ministry that protects its templates

a Ministry that protects its workflows

a Ministry that protects its hierarchy

a Ministry that protects its rabbits

And the environment?

It’s not even on the chart.

 

 
90,000+ Rabbit Burrow Pictures
 

 

Nigel’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 
Share
 
 
Like
 
Comment
 
Restack
 
 

© 2026 Nigel Gray
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 
Unsubscribe

Get the appStart writing