An extension over a simple question.

I will sum this up simply by saying the question to MSD was why must a beneficiary sign anything to receive their entitlement. The production of a form of official ID and a bank statement with proof of the account # is all that is required. 

Yet we are asking where is the Authority to insist that a form must be signed by the pensioner. We see this as entrapment and Joinder. A simple question that they have delayed answering for many months. WHY

Kia ora

Thank you for your email advising that the Ministry has extended the timeframe
for responding to my Official Information Act request until 20 July 2026.

I note that the extension relies on sections 15(1) and 15A of the Official
Information Act on the basis that consultations are necessary before a decision
can be made.

While I acknowledge the Ministry’s ability to extend the statutory timeframe
where the Act permits, I ask that the Ministry provide further clarification
regarding the consultation process and the measures being taken to ensure the
response is complete, accurate and reliable.

In particular, please advise:

1. Which business units within MSD are being consulted.

2. Whether consultation includes any external agencies or third parties.

3. The general purpose of those consultations.

4. What searches have already been undertaken to identify information within
   the scope of my request.

5. What steps are being taken to ensure that all relevant information is
identified, preserved, reviewed and accurately disclosed.

6. Whether any information that has already been identified and is capable of release can be provided on a staged or rolling basis before the final
response date.

As a public service agency exercising statutory functions on behalf of the
Crown, I expect that the Ministry’s response will be complete, accurate and
based on appropriate records management and quality assurance processes.

I appreciate your attention to these matters and look forward to your response.

Anne

 iSAYSO.net

>

 On 29 Jun 2026, at 09:50, OIA_Requests (MSD) <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> IN-CONFIDENCE
>
>
> 

Kia ora Anne
>
>

 I am writing to you regarding your request for information below. 

This letter
> is to advise you that the Ministry requires more time to respond to this
> request. In accordance with section 15(1) and 15A of the Official Information
> Act, the Ministry’s decision will be with you no later than *20 July 2026.*

> The reason for the extension is that consultations necessary to make a

 
> decision on the request are such that a proper response to the request cannot
> 

reasonably be made within the original time limit.
>
>

 You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of
> 

this decision. Information about how to make a complaint is available at
> 

www.ombudsman.parliament.nz <http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/>

 or 0800 802
> 602.
>
>

We won’t bother about the rest

If you wish to discuss any aspect of your request with us, including this
> decision, please feel free to contact [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> I will respond to you sooner if I am able to.
>
> Ngā mihi
>
> *Official Information team****|** Ministerial and Executive Services *
>
> *Ministry of Social Development*
>
> **
>
> *Our Purpose:
> *We help New Zealanders to be safe, strong and independent.
> Manaaki Tangata, Manaaki Whānau.
>
> *From:*F Q <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Sent:* Monday, 1 June 2026 6:36 am
> *To:* OIA_Requests (MSD) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; Ministerial Services Inbox [TSY]
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Cc:* Records <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Subject:* Official Information Act Request — Statutory Basis for Requiring
> Signature of MSD / Work and Income Forms
>
> To: Ministry of Social Development
>
> Date: 1 June 26
>
> Dear Ministry of Social Development​ and Tresury
>
> I make this request under the Official Information Act 1982.
>
> This request concerns the statutory basis, legal effect, and operational
> authority relied on by MSD / Work and Income when requiring a beneficiary,
> pension applicant, superannuitant, or MSD client to sign a form, declaration,
> consent, authority, acknowledgement, agreement, or other legal document.
>
> For clarity, this request is not asking whether MSD may require information
> reasonably necessary to verify identity, assess eligibility, calculate
> entitlement, administer payment, prevent overpayment, or maintain records.
>
> The question is narrower:
>
> Where, precisely, does the law require a person to sign MSD’s legal form or
> declaration, rather than simply provide the required identity, eligibility,
> and entitlement information in another written form?
>
> Please provide the following information.
>
> 1. Statutory basis for compulsory signature
>
> Please identify and provide all statutory provisions, regulations, rules,
> delegations, approved-form authorities, instruments, policy authorities, or
> other legal bases relied on by MSD to require a client to sign an MSD / Work
> and Income form, declaration, consent, authority, acknowledgement, agreement,
> or other document as a condition of:
>
> 1. applying for a benefit, pension, supplement, hardship payment, disability-
> related payment, or other MSD-administered payment;
>
> 2. continuing to receive payment;
>
> 3. having payment reinstated;
>
> 4. having a decision reviewed or corrected;
>
> 5. avoiding delay, suspension, cancellation, deduction, debt, non-payment, or
> adverse action;
>
> 6. authorising information collection, third-party disclosure, data matching,
> automated processing, deductions, debt recovery, or compliance action.
>
> 2. Difference between providing information and signing legal wording
>
> Please provide all documents explaining MSD’s position on whether a client may
> satisfy their legal obligations by providing the required information in
> writing without signing MSD’s preferred form or legal declaration.
>
> Please include all policies, legal guidance, operational guidance, staff
> instructions, manuals, training material, and internal advice explaining:
>
> 1. whether MSD distinguishes between providing required information and
> signing a form;
>
> 2. whether a client can provide identity and eligibility information by
> letter, email, written statement, statutory declaration, or other written record;
>
> 3. when MSD says a signature is legally required;
>
> 4. when a signature is only preferred for administrative convenience;
>
> 5. what staff must do if a client provides the required information but
> declines to sign the form wording;
>
> 6. whether MSD may refuse to process, delay, suspend, cancel, or decline
> payment solely because the client has not signed the form, despite providing
> the required information.
>
>  3. Legal effect of signing MSD forms
>
> Please provide all documents explaining the legal effect of signing MSD / Work
> and Income forms, declarations, authorities, consents, acknowledgements,
> agreements, or other documents.
>
> Please identify:
>
> 1. what legal obligations the client accepts by signing;
>
> 2. whether signing creates any new obligation beyond obligations already
> imposed by statute;
>
> 3. whether signing alters the client’s entitlement, review rights, appeal
> rights, privacy rights, evidence position, or legal liability;
>
> 4. whether signing authorises third-party information sharing;
>
> 5. whether signing authorises data matching;
>
> 6. whether signing authorises automated processing or automated decision-making;
>
> 7. whether signing authorises deductions or debt recovery;
>
> 8. whether signing operates as an acknowledgement, waiver, consent, indemnity,
> admission, or agreement;
>
> 9. whether signing changes, limits, transfers, or reduces MSD’s statutory
> responsibility to make lawful decisions.
>
>  4. Consequences of refusing to sign
>
> Please provide all policies, legal guidance, operational guidance, training
> material, decision-making instructions, and template correspondence explaining
> what MSD may do when a client:
>
> 1. refuses to sign a form;
>
> 2. disputes the legal effect of a form;
>
> 3. asks for the statutory basis before signing;
>
> 4. provides all required information but does not sign;
>
> 5. asks to amend, qualify, cross out, reserve rights, or annotate the form
> before signing;
>
> 6. asks for human review before adverse action is taken.
>
> Please identify the statutory basis for any adverse consequence, including:
>
> 1. delay;
>
> 2. refusal to process;
>
> 3. non-payment;
>
> 4. suspension;
>
> 5. cancellation;
>
> 6. reduction of payment;
>
> 7. deduction;
>
> 8. debt creation;
>
> 9. debt recovery;
>
> 10. adverse review outcome;
>
> 11. compliance action;
>
> 12. fraud or investigation referral.
>
>  5. Approved forms and mandatory wording
>
> Please provide:
>
> 1. a list of all current MSD / Work and Income forms that MSD considers
> mandatory for clients to sign;
>
> 2. the statutory or legal authority for each mandatory form;
>
> 3. the current version of each mandatory form;
>
> 4. the date each form was approved;
>
> 5. the officer or office that approved each form;
>
> 6. any legal review, plain-language review, privacy review, human-rights
> review, or accessibility review of the wording;
>
> 7. any documents explaining why the wording is required;
>
> 8. any documents explaining whether clients may provide the information
> another way.
>
>  6. Vulnerable-client safeguards
>
> Please provide all policies, guidance, training material, and risk assessments
> explaining how MSD ensures that elderly, disabled, medically unwell,
> cognitively impaired, digitally excluded, language-limited, homeless, or
> otherwise vulnerable clients understand the legal effect of forms before being
> required to sign.
>
> Please include documents explaining:
>
> 1. when staff must explain the form;
>
> 2. when staff must involve a support person, advocate, interpreter, attorney,
> welfare guardian, or representative;
>
> 3. when signing should not be required immediately;
>
> 4. how capacity or comprehension concerns are handled;
>
> 5. how MSD records that the client understood the form;
>
> 6. how MSD avoids pressure, coercion, or disadvantage where a person asks for
> advice before signing.
>
>  7. Accountability and decision-maker responsibility
>
> Please provide all documents explaining whether MSD considers signing a form
> to transfer, reduce, limit, or alter MSD’s statutory accountability for lawful
> decision-making.
>
> Please answer specifically:
>
> 1. does MSD consider the client’s signature to make the client responsible for
> MSD’s decision?
>
> 2. does MSD consider the client’s signature to reduce MSD’s duty to correctly
> assess entitlement?
>
> 3. does MSD consider the client’s signature to reduce MSD’s duty to explain
> decisions and review rights?
>
> 4. does MSD consider the client’s signature to authorise adverse decisions
> based on automated processing, data matching, or third-party records?
>
> 5. does MSD consider the client’s signature to waive any right the client
> would otherwise have?
>
> If the answer to any of the above is yes, please provide the statutory basis
> and all supporting documents.
>
> 8. Complaints, reviews, and known issues
>
> For each of the last five financial years, please provide any available
> statistics, reports, audits, reviews, complaints analysis, or internal
> briefings concerning:
>
> 1. clients refusing or disputing forms;
>
> 2. clients asking for the legal basis before signing;
>
> 3. payments delayed because a form was not signed;
>
> 4. payments suspended or cancelled because a form was not signed;
>
> 5. decisions later corrected, withdrawn, reversed, or back-paid after a form-
> signature issue;
>
> 6. complaints that form wording was confusing, misleading, coercive, unclear,
> too broad, or not properly explained;
>
> 7. complaints from elderly, disabled, medically unwell, cognitively impaired,
> digitally excluded, language-limited, or vulnerable clients about forms or
> signatures.
>
> 9. Clarification sought
>
> For clarity, please answer this question directly:
>
> If a client provides all information reasonably required to verify identity,
> assess eligibility, calculate entitlement, and administer payment, what exact
> legal authority allows MSD to require that client to sign MSD’s preferred
> legal form or declaration as a condition of payment?
>
> Please do not answer this only by referring to policy, practice,
> administrative convenience, or operational preference. If MSD says the
> signature is legally compulsory, please identify the statutory basis and the
> legal effect of the signature.
>
> 10. Format, refusal, transfer, and refinement
>
> Please provide the information electronically.
>
> If any part of this request is refused, please identify:
>
> 1. the specific part refused;
>
> 2. the statutory ground relied on;
>
> 3. the reason for refusal;
>
> 4. whether the information exists in another form;
>
> 5. whether the request can be refined rather than refused.
>
> If MSD considers that any part of this request is held by another agency,
> Minister, or Crown entity, please transfer that part under section 14 of the
> Official Information Act and advise me of the transfer.
>
> If MSD considers the request broad, please do not refuse it without first
> identifying which parts can be answered immediately and which parts MSD says
> require refinement.
>
> Yours faithfully,
>
> Anne
>
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential
> and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and attachments
> is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the
> author immediately and erase all copies of the email and attachments. The
> Ministry of Social Development accepts no responsibility for changes made to
> this message or attachments after transmission from the Ministry.