iSAYSO
Contribute

Official Information Act Request – LRAD Deployment (2 March 2022, Wellington)

Share on FacebookShare on XInteractive reader

Tēnā koe Tracy,

I acknowledge receipt of your Official Information Act 1982 (OIA) requests attached.

 Your reference number is IR-01-26-14407.

 You can expect a response to your request on or before 21 May 2026 unless an extension is needed. 
Ngā mihi

 Jonelle|Advisor: Ministerial Services |(she/her)

Policy & Partnerships |Police National Headquarters |

 

 ===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this message or any of its contents. Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

ForwardedMessage.eml

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] OIA LRAD

From:

Records <[email protected]>

Date:

22/04/2026, 9:16 pm

To:

Ministerial Services <[email protected]>

CC:

Records <[email protected]>

 

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the New Zealand Police Network. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are assured that the content is safe.

 

Official Information Act Request – LRAD Deployment (2 March 2022, Wellington)

To: Official Information Act Requests
New Zealand Police

I make the following request under the Official Information Act 1982.

This request relates to the deployment and use of a Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) by Police during operations at Parliament Grounds, Wellington, on 2 March 2022.

This request is confined to formal, authoritative, and operational records.
 

1. Deployment Authority and Planning

– All documents evidencing the decision to deploy an LRAD, including operational orders, tactical plans, risk assessments, and approvals.
– Identification of decision-maker(s).
– Whether deployment formed part of pre-event planning or reactive decision-making.

2. Policy and Operational Thresholds

– Policies or guidelines governing LRAD deployment and use.
– Thresholds for escalation from communication to aversive use.
– Requirements for necessity, proportionality, and consideration of alternatives.

3. Evidential Basis for Use

– Records relied upon to justify LRAD use, including logs, SITREPs, intelligence, and threat records.
– All supporting audio-visual material.

4. Timing and Escalation Sequence

– Timeline showing when LRAD was deployed, activated, and escalated.
– Events relied upon to justify escalation.

5. Alternatives Considered

– Documents identifying alternative tactics considered and reasons for rejection.

6. National Usage and Comparative Data

– All instances of LRAD deployment before and after 2 March 2022.
– Date, location, and purpose of each deployment.

7. Training and Certification

– Operator training, certification, and safety guidance.

8. Post-Event Review

– Reviews, debriefs, or evaluations of LRAD use.

9. Procurement and Availability

– Dates LRAD devices were procured and approved.
– Procurement documents and approvals.
– Whether specifically prepared for the protest.
– Deployment timing to Wellington and authority for deployment.

10. Source, Ownership, and Operation

– Supplier and procurement records.
– Ownership (Police or other agency).
– Inter-agency agreements.
– Identity and role of operators.
– Training and authorisation records.

11. Risk Assessment and Justification

– Risk and threat assessments justifying LRAD use.
– Nature of threat identified.
– Threshold for use and how met.
– Briefings to Ministers or officials.
– Post-event evaluations of risk accuracy and justification.

Format:
I request this information in electronic form where possible.
 

If any part of this request is likely to be refused under section 18(f), I am willing to refine the request. Please advise.
 

I remind the agency of its duty under section 13 to provide reasonable assistance.

 

I look forward to your response within the statutory timeframe.

Tracy 

ForwardedMessage.eml

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] OIA LRAD

From:

Records <[email protected]>

Date:

22/04/2026, 7:13 pm

To:

Ministerial Services <[email protected]>

CC:

Records <[email protected]>

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the New Zealand Police Network. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are assured that the content is safe.

 

 

 
I request the following information under the Official Information Act 1982 regarding the deployment and use of Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRAD) during the Parliament protest on or about 2 March 2022.
 
This request is limited to formal records, logs, and reports held by New Zealand Police.
 
 1.  Decision-making authority
 
a. The name, rank, and role of each person who authorised:
   – (i) deployment of LRAD; and  
   – (ii) use of the aversion tone.
 
b. The identity of the Incident Controller (CIMS) at the relevant times.
 
c. Any written records of authorisation, including:
   – command logs  
   – situation reports  
   – operational notes  
 
d. Any delegation instruments or documents establishing authority to approve use of force tools such as LRAD.
 
2. Operational safeguards and compliance
 
a. All TENR assessments or equivalent risk assessments relating to LRAD deployment.
 
b. Records showing how SOP requirements were applied, including:
   – distance from persons  
   – duration and pattern of aversion tone use  
   – any recorded output or volume settings  
 
c. Any records identifying departures from SOP and the reasons for those departures.
 
3. Training and competency
 
a. The identities (or consistent anonymised identifiers) of LRAD operators.
 
b. For each operator:
   – certification and re-certification dates  
   – confirmation of qualification to use the aversion tone  
 
c. Training materials in force at the time addressing:
   – safe operating limits  
   – risk of injury to the public  
   – authorisation requirements  
 
4. Harm, complaints, and review
 
a. Any records of injury, adverse effects, or medical issues associated with LRAD use.
 
b. All complaint records relating to LRAD use, including:
   – intake logs  
   – classification records  
   – referrals (including to IPCA)
 
c. Any post-incident reviews, debriefs, or evaluations addressing:
   – proportionality  
   – effectiveness  
   – public impact  
 
d. If any records are said not to exist, please specify:
   – systems searched  
   – search methodology  
 
5. Location and legal basis
 
a. Documents identifying the legal basis for Police use of force tools within the Parliamentary precinct.
 
b. Any communications with Parliamentary Service or the Office of the Speaker regarding Police operational activity in that area.
 
6. Equipment sourcing and placement
 
a. Ownership and source of LRAD units used.
 
b. Records of placement, relocation, or staging of LRAD units, including any third-party sites.
 
 
This request is made with due particularity and seeks existing records only.
 
If any part is likely to be refused, I request assistance to refine it under section 18B.
 
Tracy lynch